[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
At 01:09 PM 8/18/2002 -0400, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
>At 10:13 AM -0700 8/18/02, Ann Navarro wrote:
>
>
>>Funny thing about the three-namespaces battle is that another WG (SVG?)
>>went off and did what we proposed back then, and either a) nobody
>>noticed, or b) nobody complained.
>
>Really? Where? I just checked and SVG 1.0, SVG 1.1, SVG Tiny, and SVG
>Mobile all seem to be using the same namesapce: http://www.w3.org/2000/svg
The question mark in (SVG?) was that I wasn't positive it was them, I'll
dig around as a have time to find the Rec in which this came up.
Ann
|
