[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Understood. But mapping may be necessary or acceptance
of the limits of striping. It's a case of half-measures
where half-measures are adequate. It is also a design
issue. If one is designing new vocabularies rather than
shoe horning legacy vocabularies, designing with the SW
in mind from the beginning would appear to be a good idea.
len
-----Original Message-----
From: Emmanuil Batsis (Manos) [mailto:mbatsis@humanmarkup.org]
Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> one
>may want to know the document type to determine if a set of
>rules can be created to cover issues such as the meaningfulness
>of the containment relationships. It seems that less and less
>can be done without a priori knowledge of the document type.
>
True and I wouldn't want to go through mappings between the document
structure and it's RDF counterparts for each different case. Sounds
inconvinient and very error prone.
>Hmmm... perhaps some other forms of KR should be investigated
>as well.
>
One will have to map any form of KR to markup anyway, unless an XML
serialization for it already exists so I think I'll stick to what I have
for now ;-)
|
