[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
At 09:51 PM 8/1/2002 -0400, Benderjgxd@aol.com wrote:
>In a message dated 8/1/2002 8:36:12 PM Central Daylight Time,
>dareo@microsoft.com writes:
>
>
>>What is broken is the existence of a default namespace. Further mangling
>>Namespaces in XML to accomodate this mistake is unwise and borders on
>>foolishness.
>
>
>I disagree. What is broken is the possibility of local naming, where any
>namespaces are used. Or rather, what XML Schema seems to call unqualified
>names.
That cuts even closer than Dare's original posting - I'd considered the
setting of the default namespace to "" when I read his.
Mixing qualified and unqualified seems to be a more fundamental problem
than whether or not we slap prefixes on things.
Hey, progress!
Simon St.Laurent
"Every day in every way I'm getting better and better." - Emile Coue
|
