Lists Home |
Date Index |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ann Navarro [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2002 11:28 AM
> To: Simon St.Laurent; firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: RE: [xml-dev] W3C XFrames - first public WD published
> The premise of the question, I believe, is actually faulty --
> it assumes
> XHTML 1.0 hasn't caught on, and I don't believe that's the case.
> Even if that assertion were to remain debated, as Simon says,
> XHTML 2.0
> moves away from any attempts at backward compatibility,
> leaving it free to
> accomplish so much more moving forward.
I just checked. None of the 15 sites I visit daily uses XHTML and this
includes several W3C pages [although it seems the front page of the
website is XHTML 1.0]. I'm sure you believe one thing but pardon me if I
continue to believe another based on my daily experiences on the WWW.
PS: I just tried 10 more sites and it seems Brunching ShuttleCocks does
support XHTML (http://www.brunching.com). So that's currently 4% of my
bookmark list that uses XHTML.
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM
A man who can smile when everything has gone wrong has probably thought
of who he can blame it on.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no