[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
At 09:20 AM 8/6/2002 -0700, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
>Just out of curiosity, does anyone else wonder why there is an XHTML 2.0
>when XHTML 1.0 doesn't seem to have caught on? Anyone involved with it
>care to chime in?
Maybe they're hoping that Microsoft will takes steps to recognize and
possibly even implement a 2.0? That 1.0 and 1.1 were just too low a
version number?
1.0 and 1.1 were pretty much just codifications of existing HTML 4.0
practice redone using XML syntax. 2.0 should be a big step forward from that.
Simon St.Laurent
"Every day in every way I'm getting better and better." - Emile Coue
|
