[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Julian Reschke writes:
> > Given that a lot of IE's clunkiness with XML+CSS is its apparent
> > insistence on pouring XML into an HTML object model, I think I
> > could take that as agreement.
> >
> > There is, of course, a cycle. Web designers don't care about XML
> > since the browsers don't support it in forms that are easier for
> > them - learning XSLT is kind of a bother - so browser vendors can
> > say they don't support it because nobody cares.
> >
> > Inertia is great stuff.
>
> How can you say "inertia" if both Mozilla and IE6 *do* support XSLT?
I was referring to IE's CSS support. XSLT isn't exactly an easy
substitute for most web developers.
--
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com
|
