[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
>>What is broken is the existence of a default namespace. Further mangling
>>Namespaces in XML to accomodate this mistake is unwise and borders on
>>foolishness.
>Fair enough. That cuts to the core more neatly than any of the other
>proposals I've heard or made.
I don't see what the default namespace has to do with the attribute
issue. Unprefixed attributes are *not* in the default namespace.
The "obviously stupid" example
<x:foo x:att="one" att="two"/>
does not use the default namespace in any way, and would be equally
legal and stupid if the default namespace didn't exist.
-- Richard
|
