[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Hmm, interesting observation.
Is there a reason why there must be only a single top-level <row> or
<column>?
I could easily imagine:
<column>
<frame/>
<colulmn>
<column>
<frame/>
</column>
This would be both consistent with table notation and more familiar.
.micah
-----Original Message-----
From: J. David Eisenberg [mailto:catcode@catcode.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2002 6:52 AM
To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] W3C XFrames - first public WD published
Let me see if I have this correct:
1. To place two documents next to each other, you specify
OLD WAY (framesets) NEW WAY (XFrames)
<frameset cols="50%,*"> <row>
<frame /> <frame />
<frame /> <frame />
</frameset> </row>
2. To put two documents one above the other, you specify
OLD WAY (framesets) NEW WAY (XFrames)
<frameset rows="50%,*"> <column>
<frame /> <frame />
<frame /> <frame />
</frameset> </column>
Out of habit, I have gotten used to seeing two frames next
to each other as two columns; now it is one row with two frames.
I have gotten used to seeing two frames above one another as
two separate rows; now it is a column with two frames in it.
I realize that this now makes things more consistent with table notation,
but you think this will confuse anyone else, or even bother them for more
than a millisecond?
--
J. David Eisenberg http://catcode.com/
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
|
