[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
At 3:48 PM +0200 9/17/02, Eric van der Vlist wrote:
>So that people ommit to include SYSTEM ids and that the documents can't
>be read by common namespace aware XML parsers any longer?
This is an issue for XHTML 2.0 to address. In fact, I suspect it
does. Such a document would be malformed XML, and rejected by all
conformant parsers including XHTML parsers.
I suspect most people generating XHTML 2.0 will either use tools that
automatically insert the right SYSTEM ID for the W3C web site, or
copy and paste an example that does that.
I guess some people might use relative URLs and forget to put the
DTDs where they say they did, but that does seem a little picky.
--
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| XML in a Nutshell, 2nd Edition (O'Reilly, 2002) |
| http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian2/ |
| http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0596002920/cafeaulaitA/ |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
| Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ |
| Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/ |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|
