[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 15:28, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
> For instance, a basic img (Excuse me, object) element might look like this:
>
> <object xlink:href="http://www.example.com/image.jpg";
> width="100" height="100" other_non_linking_attributes="..."/>
>
> That's all. xlink:type and the namespace declaration would be
> defaulted in from the DTD. The DTD would be built into web browsers
> which would recognize the public identifier for XHTML 2.0.
So that people ommit to include SYSTEM ids and that the documents can't
be read by common namespace aware XML parsers any longer? We've had this
kind of behavior in one of the versions of the Adobe SVG reader awhile
ago and we are still paying for this mistake since many SVG documents
around the world just "forget" to declare the xlink namespace...
Doesn't seem such a good idea to me :-) ...
Eric (just being picky)
--
Rendez-vous à Paris.
http://www.technoforum.fr/integ2002/index.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
![http://www.example.com/image.jpg"](http://www.example.com/image.jpg"){kind=link}