RE: [xml-dev] Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: [xml-dev] TAG on HLink)

["Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>]

Simple question: Does HLink fit into the rest of the XML architecture that is currently being built by the W3C? My personal opinion is that it doesn't and shouldn't although I agree that the HTML working group needs something like this for their unique use case. 
 
It's quite interesting to note that although HTML brought the W3C to prominence and XML even more so, the descendants of HTML do not fit in the current vision and body of work the W3C is going forward with. 

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@simonstl.com] 
	Sent: Fri 9/27/2002 10:35 AM 
	To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org 
	Cc: 
	Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re: [xml-dev] TAG on HLink)
	
	

	
	I'm still waiting for an open explanation of how we got into this mess
	in the first place, and why the TAG so unanimously opted to reject
	HLink.  We're missing a lot of context that would help clear technical
	discussion, so don't be surprised that you're getting a lot of emotions.
	
	
	-------------
	Simon St.Laurent - SSL is my TLA
	http://simonstl.com may be my URI
	http://monasticxml.org may be my ascetic URI
	urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.6320 is another possibility altogether
	
	-----------------------------------------------------------------
	The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
	initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
	
	The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
	
	To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
	manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>