xml-dev - Re: RE: [xml-dev] Rethinking namespaces,attribute remapping (was Re:[xm

Re: RE: [xml-dev] Rethinking namespaces,attribute remapping (was Re:[xm

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: RE: [xml-dev] Rethinking namespaces,attribute remapping (was Re:[xml-dev] TAG on HLink)
From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 15:24:28 -0400
In-reply-to: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E07A972AD@red-msg-06.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

9/27/2002 3:13:47 PM, "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com> wrote:

><sulky-voice>Mike started it</sulky-voice>

Only because I didn't have a freakin' clue what "Architectural Forms" were until someone said that HLink 
embodied that design pattern, then it All Made Sense :-)  Just like XSLT made DSSSL finally penetrate the 
mush.

I've been trying to figure out Groves since about 1996; maybe someday there will be a concrete embodiment 
that finally penetrates my poor neurons :-)

Follow-Ups:
- Groves (was re: bunch of other stuff...)
  - From: Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re:[xml-dev] TAG on HLink)
  - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re:[xml-dev] TAG on HLink)
  - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re:[xml-dev] TAG on HLink)
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re:[xml-dev] TAG on HLink)
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re:[xml-dev] TAG on HLink)
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Rethinking namespaces, attribute remapping (was Re:[xml-dev] TAG on HLink)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread