Lists Home |
Date Index |
Rick Jelliffe wrote:
>So no DTD is needed. If someone uses character entities in a document
>being sent to a lightweight parser that didn't provide its own
>it would be a WF error, as currently exists.
Question: why is this currently a WF error, as opposed to a validity error?
Are there any known cases of processing that *depends* on this being
a WF error (and would thus be surprised if it someday became allowed)?
I too would like to see some experimentation with alternatives, but the
WF obstacle is pretty tough.