OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   Re: [xml-dev] is XML complete?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

At 02:54 PM 11/6/2002 -0500, AndrewWatt2000@aol.com wrote:
>In a message dated 06/11/2002 19:45:13 GMT Standard Time, 
>jonathan.robie@datadirect-technologies.com writes:
>>I agree.
>>Fortunately, XSL, XPath, and XQuery use the same data model now. I'm very
>>happy with the changes that will show up in the next round of publication,
>>which make the document simpler and more readable. This model is quite
>>similar to the XPath 1.0 data model, with types added.
>I look forward to seeing that next version of the multi-document edition 
>of XQuery/XSLT 2.0/XPath 2.0. I know you can't say "when" but is it close?


>I guess we are moving to an XML world with approximately two data models:
>1. DOM in the browser for SVG, XHTML etc
>2. XQuery/XPath/XSLT/Infoset/AABSABI for the rest
>Is that approximately how you see it?

For the people who cook an entire data model and then use it, I think that 
the DOM and the XQuery/XPath/XSLT data models will be the two models people 
will use. The InfoSet will usually be exposed via one of these two models, 
and datatypes will be exposed in the XQuery/XPath/XSLT model.

Of course, there's always SAX programmers or people who mung XML with 
text-based tools. They won't need these models.



News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS