Re: [xml-dev] What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?

[AndrewWatt2000@aol.com]

In a message dated 20/11/2002 14:43:18 GMT Standard Time, ann@webgeek.com writes:


> <wild_supposition type="breathless">You just have to wonder why anyone would bother continually responding to obvious flame bait</wild_supposition>
>  
> Ann


Hi Ann,

I will simply observe that your response totally lacks any logical argument to support the supposition that XHTML 2.0 is a good idea or that it is relevant in the changing world which will soon be upon us.

Regards

Andrew Watt