[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
AndrewWatt2000@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 20/11/2002 14:43:18 GMT Standard Time,
> ann@webgeek.com writes:
>> <wild_supposition type="breathless">You just have to wonder why anyone
>> would bother continually responding to obvious flame
>> bait</wild_supposition>
>
> Hi Ann,
>
> I will simply observe that your response totally lacks any logical
> argument to support the supposition that XHTML 2.0 is a good idea or
> that it is relevant in the changing world which will soon be upon us.
The logic is quite simple:
- AndrewWatt2000@aol.com can't refrain from posting ugly HTML to mailing lists
- XHTML 2.0 is a big improvement on ugly HTML
=> XHTML 2.0 will make several lists less painful to follow
--
Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Research Engineer, Expway
7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE 8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488
|
