xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?

RE: [xml-dev] What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
From: "Ann Navarro" <ann@webgeek.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 11:19:13 -0500
Cc: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <3DDBAC1C.90908@expway.fr>



-----Original Message-----
From: Robin Berjon [mailto:robin.berjon@expway.fr]


The logic is quite simple:

   - AndrewWatt2000@aol.com can't refrain from posting ugly HTML to mailing
lists
   - XHTML 2.0 is a big improvement on ugly HTML
     => XHTML 2.0 will make several lists less painful to follow

---

Well, if there's no flamage to be found here, we'll just go dig it up
elsewhere, apparently:

'Andrew Watt
"XHTML 2.0 - the W3C leading the Web to its full potential ... to implement
yesterday's technology tomorrow"'

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
  - From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
- RE: [xml-dev] What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
  - From: "Gerben Rampaart (Casnet Mechelen)" <Gerben@Casnet.net>

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
  - From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Why RDF is hard
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread