[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Let me try to change where this thread is heading somewhat by asking you
this:
What are XHTML 2.0 biggest benefits over XHTML 1.0 ? And has the industry
caught up enough to release 2.0 ?
Gerben.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ann Navarro [mailto:ann@webgeek.com]
Sent: 20 November 2002 17:19
To: robin.berjon@expway.fr
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
-----Original Message-----
From: Robin Berjon [mailto:robin.berjon@expway.fr]
The logic is quite simple:
- AndrewWatt2000@aol.com can't refrain from posting ugly HTML to mailing
lists
- XHTML 2.0 is a big improvement on ugly HTML
=> XHTML 2.0 will make several lists less painful to follow
---
Well, if there's no flamage to be found here, we'll just go dig it up
elsewhere, apparently:
'Andrew Watt
"XHTML 2.0 - the W3C leading the Web to its full potential ... to implement
yesterday's technology tomorrow"'
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
|
