OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   Re: [xml-dev] bohemians, gentry

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

Jonathan Robie:

> A processor is only allowed to canonicalize typed data, and is certainly 
> never required to. In the absence of a datatype, the application could not 
> safely canonicalize, but the datatype says clearly how the data is to be 
> interpreted.
> And one reason this can be helpful is the kind of interoperability problems 
> illustrated by your example: How many numbers does the following element 
> contain?
>          <Weight>0<!--I added this leading 0 for a reason-->123.4560</Weight>
> Of course, you could simply say that depends on the application, and the 
> markup should not mandate whether one weight or two is intended...but 
> doesn't that tightly couple your data to the applications used to process it?

Huh?  This is such a twisted leap of logic that I really don't know where to 
start in comprehending it.  How does the fact that the XML does not directly 
provide answers to how an application interprets the data sufddenly tightly 
couple the data to the XML.  I could be really cheeky and ask you for 
concrete, but I'll settle for anything that elucidates this point of yours.

Uche Ogbuji                                    Fourthought, Inc.
http://uche.ogbuji.net    http://4Suite.org    http://fourthought.com
Tour of 4Suite - http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2002/10/16/py-xml.html
Proper XML Output in Python - http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2002/11/13/py-xml.html
RSS for Python - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ws-pyth11.html
Debug XSLT on the fly - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-debugxs.html


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS