xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more pate nt fun

Re: [xml-dev] Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more pate nt fun

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more pate nt fun
From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 14:11:09 -0500
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EEEACE35@hq1.pcmail.ingr.com>
References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EEEACE35@hq1.pcmail.ingr.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130

Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> Yep.  I am in total agreement with that except they 
> specify technologies and call those standards.  It's a 
> quibble but one I have to repeat.  I'm a lot happier 
> when private consortia specify technologies and then 
> these technologies by adoption become de facto standards.

To close the loop:  i'm in agreement with your note above. :)
	/r$

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more pate nt fun
  - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more pate nt fun
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more pate nt fun
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more pate nt fun
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread