OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   RE: [xml-dev] Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more pate nt fun

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

You can implement it, yes; you can't change the design 
or adapt the specification.  They gave up no rights; 
they don't charge you to implement it.  Quite.  And 
it isn't submitted as a specification for all to 
comment on, change, or otherwise dink with.  Java 
is an even more restricted case.  Of course, if Java were 
submitted to the W3C as a specification candidate, 
would the Java programmers be happy about that? 
Interestingly, both Adobe and Sun make the same 
case for not doing that; they say that they can 
maintain and evolve it better than open standards 
groups can.  So maybe some fundamental Internet 
technologies are better handled as proprietary 


-----Original Message-----
From: Elliotte Rusty Harold [mailto:elharo@metalab.unc.edu]

At 12:43 PM -0600 1/17/03, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:

>As for market amplification, that's hard to predict.
>Why hasn't Adobe given up the rights to PDF

They have. PDF is freely implementable, and is in fact freely implemented.


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS