RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth meets ConciseXML syntax (was two extremely similar threads...)

["Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>]

I'm not sure how the latter thread (ConciseXML) argues against direct
access. Adam Bosworth is arguing for better support for processing XML
in programming languages/APIs while Mike seems to be arguing for a
mechanism for serializing objects to markup. Both threads seem
complementary to me. 

-- 
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
A pipe gives a wise man time to think and a fool something to stick in
his mouth.                           

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. 

>  
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Rafter [mailto:jeffrafter@defined.net] 
> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 12:22 PM
> To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> 
> I can't decide if this is some sort of strange good cop bad 
> cop marketing ploy. I thought I would point out the extreme 
> irony of these two threads appearing at the same time. One 
> argues for direct access while the other argues against it. 
> Either Mike and Walter are secretly in cahoots or the XML 
> Universe is caving in.
> 
> Cheers,
> Jeff Rafter
> Defined Systems
> http://www.defined.net
> XML Development and Developer Web Hosting
> 
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org 
> <http://www.xml.org>, an initiative of OASIS 
> <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> 
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
> 
>