[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
> Why do the schema languages care about the particular
> order of the XML nodes?
This may be important if parsing an XML document using DOM - for
example, one may want to "place" elements that are always/often accessed
(such as primary key values in relational database terms) near the top
of an XML document, or near the top of a content model within an XML
document for performance purposes. (But since a tree for the entire
document needs to be built anyway, this may not buy you much in terms of
performance - just thinking out loud).
Joe Chiusano
Booz | Allen | Hamilton
"Bryce K. Nielsen" wrote:
>
> > 1) Use another schema language (Relax NG does this very well) instead of
> > W3C XML Schema.
> >
> I'm somewhat new to Relax NG, but reading through it's primer doc it
> appeared that the Order of the Elements was also strictly governed by the
> schema (in other words, you can't do this in RelaxNG either). Which brings
> the question, WHY? Why do the schema languages care about the particular
> order of the XML nodes? I can see the advantages of having this as an option
> (i.e. something like <sequence order="fixed"> or something) but to make it a
> requirement seems to backwards for most XML usages.
>
> -BKN
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
begin:vcard
n:Chiusano;Joseph
tel;work:(703) 902-6923
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:www.bah.com
org:Booz | Allen | Hamilton;IT Digital Strategies Team
adr:;;8283 Greensboro Drive;McLean;VA;22012;
version:2.1
email;internet:chiusano_joseph@bah.com
title:Senior Consultant
fn:Joseph M. Chiusano
end:vcard
|
