[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
I assume Mike is talking about the fact that it is not possible to embed one well-formed document in another and still be conformant XML if the embedded document contains a prolog. One can resort to hacks to get around this (PIs or CDATA sections) but I assume some would rather have a "blessed" way of achieving this.
-----Original Message-----
From: Uche Ogbuji [mailto:uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com]
Sent: Sun 2/2/2003 7:10 AM
To: Mike Champion
Cc: elharo@metalab.unc.edu; xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
> XML 1.x is not
> composable as specified, which makes the full spec unusable for a header-
> extension model such as SOAP offers, and so on. (See the response by the
> XMLP WG to this issue on www-tag a month ago for details).
No. I'm not interested in seeing what the XMLP WG says in some formal round
of mumbo-jumbo. If you want to put forth such a vacuous accusations as "XML
1.x is not composable as specified", please justify it here in language that
proves it is not just a case of character assassination by quiddity.
|
