|
|
xml-dev
|
|
Last updated: Sun Mar 16 16:55:28 2003
1332 messages (listed by date and indexed by thread) |
Date Index
- XML Catalog support for .Net (and others),
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- RE: [xml-dev] XML - Disruptive Technology,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- XML - Disruptive Technology,
Doug Ransom
- Namespaces conformance tests,
Karl Waclawek
- Having to programmically create XML Schema, is there a better way that just using the Document Object Model,
Bill Riegel
- getting undisered results , when trying to display japanese characters,
asim
- Markup: The Early Years,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] Unicode With Angle Brackets,
Dare Obasanjo
- XML Parsers,
Michael Hoffman
- trying to convert Java Date to/from the XML Schema dataTime datatype.,
Bill Riegel
- The supersetting has begun [Was Re: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP],
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...?,
Matthew.Bennett
- Problematical scenarios,
Matthew.Bennett
- Joint whitepaper on XML, SOAP, and Binary Data,
Mike Champion
- RE: [xml-dev] Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????),
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: [xml-dev] XML for the Restaurant Industry,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- XML for the Restaurant Industry,
Samuel Dorfman
- New release of W3C XML Schema errata, preparatory to 2nd edition,
Henry S. Thompson
- RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes,
Simon St.Laurent
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: [xml-dev] collisions (was The subsetting has begun),
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Xpath & conditional filters,
David Higgins
- RE: [xml-dev] On permathreads,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: [xm l-dev] The subsetting has begun),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- special characters,
monica.coelho
- Call for information about XML-Fragments,
MASSIMILIANO GRANDI
- [ANN] XML Standards Library 2.0 : Updated 2003-02-25,
Tech Support
- Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Matthew.Bennett
- re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
David Megginson
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Robin Berjon
- Message not available
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
J.Pietschmann
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
David Megginson
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Mike Champion
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
David Megginson
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Robin Berjon
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
David Megginson
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
David Megginson
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
David Megginson
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Robin Berjon
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Tim Bray
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Robin Berjon
- Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: [xml-dev] Parsingefficiency? - why not 'compile'????),
Mike Champion
- Re: [xml-dev] Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: [xml-dev]Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????),
=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=
- Re: [xml-dev] Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????),
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: [xml-dev] Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: [xml-dev]Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????),
Robin Berjon
- Re: [xml-dev] Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????),
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: [xml-dev] Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: [xml-dev]Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????),
=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=
- Re: [xml-dev] Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????),
Miles Sabin
- Re: [xml-dev] Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: [xml-dev]Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????),
Robin Berjon
- Re: [xml-dev] Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????),
Matt
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
W. E. Perry
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Robin Berjon
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Robin Berjon
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Robin Berjon
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Robin Berjon
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
W. E. Perry
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Tahir Hashmi
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Alaric Snell
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Dennis Sosnoski
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Robin Berjon
- Sorting out what we agree and disagree on (was Re: [xml-dev] Parsingefficiency? - why not 'compile'????),
Mike Champion
- Unicode With Angle Brackets,
Jonathan Robie
- Re: [xml-dev] Unicode With Angle Brackets,
W. E. Perry
- Re: [xml-dev] Unicode With Angle Brackets,
Bill de hÓra
- Re: [xml-dev] Sorting out what we agree and disagree on (was Re: [xml-dev] Parsingefficiency? - why not 'compile'????),
W. E. Perry
- Re: [xml-dev] Sorting out what we agree and disagree on (was Re:[xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????),
Robin Berjon
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Tahir Hashmi
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Robin Berjon
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Robin Berjon
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Tahir Hashmi
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Robin Berjon
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
John Cowan
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Robin Berjon
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- RE: [xml-dev] DOM support in IE vs. NS,
Joshua Allen
- Does IE 6.0 support XML Schema validation when displaying selected XML files,
Bill Riegel
- RE: [xml-dev] Parsing Performance,
Bill Riegel
- DOM support in IE vs. NS,
Ken Sall
- No Standard Before Its Time (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Parsing Performance),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] The waterfall model lives? (was Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Could someone give a precise definition to these terms and the relationships between them?,
Collin
- XML for RFCs,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: [xml-dev] Transformation Error , PLZ HELP,
asim
- Transformation Error , PLZ HELP,
asim
- SAX Adapter Framework - New Open Source Project,
Mark Priest
- Re: [xml-dev] The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
AndrewWatt2000
- xml/xsl won't display when used online,
James Rayner
- The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
Tim Bray
- Re: [xml-dev] The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
Don Bate
- RE: [xml-dev] The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
Don Park
- <Possible follow-ups>
- re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
Sean McGrath
- Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
Tim Bray
- Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
Mike Champion
- Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=
- Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
Miles Sabin
- Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=
- [ANN] Montreal information for Extreme 2003,
Sam Hunting
- Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
John Cowan
- Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
Mike Champion
- Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
Mark Baker
- Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
Lauren Wood
- Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
Sean McGrath
- Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- RE: [xml-dev] XQuery and SQL Server Yukon,
Dare Obasanjo
- XQuery and SQL Server Yukon,
Charles White
- nillable keyrefs in XSD,
K. Ari Krupnikov
- RE: [xml-dev] RE: Open Source or Else,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Jon.Ellis
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Amelia A.Lewis
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
John Cowan
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Evan Lenz
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Daniel Veillard
- The waterfall model lives? (was Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun),
Mike Champion
- Re: [xml-dev] The waterfall model lives? (was Re: [xml-dev] Thesubsetting has begun),
Thomas B. Passin
- Re: [xml-dev] The waterfall model lives? (was Re: [xml-dev] The subsettinghas begun),
=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=
- Re: [xml-dev] The waterfall model lives? (was Re: [xml-dev] Thesubsetting has begun),
Mike Champion
- Re: [xml-dev] The waterfall model lives? (was Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun),
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: [xml-dev] The waterfall model lives? (was Re: [xml-dev] Thesubsetting has begun),
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: [xml-dev] The waterfall model lives? (was Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun),
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: [xml-dev] The waterfall model lives? (was Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun),
Daniel Veillard
- Re: [xml-dev] The waterfall model lives?,
Norman Walsh
- Re: [xml-dev] The waterfall model lives?,
Mike Champion
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Fredrik Lindgren
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Bill de hÓra
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Dennis Sosnoski
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- FW: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Dare Obasanjo
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Bill de hÓra
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Mike Champion
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
John Cowan
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- pure XML syntax tools,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Joe English
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Tim Bray
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Rich Salz
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
John Cowan
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Alaric B. Snell
- Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: [xml-dev] Thesubsetting has begun),
Mike Champion
- Re: [xml-dev] Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: [xml-dev]The subsetting has begun),
Robin Berjon
- Re: [xml-dev] Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: [xml-dev],
John Cowan
- Re: [xml-dev] Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun),
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: [xml-dev] Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun),
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re:[xml-dev] The subsetting has begun),
Ian Graham
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Rich Salz
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Joshua Allen
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Sean McGrath
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
K. Ari Krupnikov
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Alaric B. Snell
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Cavnar-Johnson, John
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Sean McGrath
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Joe English
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
W. E. Perry
- Message not available
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
W. E. Perry
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Sean McGrath
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Sean McGrath
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Cavnar-Johnson, John
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
W. E. Perry
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Cavnar-Johnson, John
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
W. E. Perry
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
John Cowan
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Cavnar-Johnson, John
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
W. E. Perry
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Mike Champion
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Kian-Tat Lim
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Tim Bray
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Wendell Piez
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
W. E. Perry
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
John Cowan
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
W. E. Perry
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Jeff Lowery
MSXML4 : how to select a element with namespace prefix,
Anuga Laxmi Kanth Reddy
The subsetting has begun,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Mike Champion
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
John Cowan
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Gregory Murphy
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
David Megginson
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
John Cowan
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
John Cowan
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Karl Waclawek
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Martin Soukup
- Parsing Performance,
David Megginson
- RE: [xml-dev] Parsing Performance,
Martin Soukup
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing Performance,
Bill de hÓra
- RE: [xml-dev] Parsing Performance,
David Megginson
- RE: [xml-dev] Parsing Performance,
Martin Soukup
- RE: [xml-dev] Parsing Performance,
David Megginson
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing Performance,
Dennis Sosnoski
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Karl Waclawek
- More on Parsing Performance,
David Megginson
- Re: [xml-dev] More on Parsing Performance,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Bill de hÓra
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Alaric Snell
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Thomas B. Passin
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Berend de Boer
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Martin Soukup
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
John Cowan
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Martin Soukup
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Bill de hÓra
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Mike Champion
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
John Cowan
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Bill Kearney
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
K. Ari Krupnikov
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Norman Walsh
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Cavnar-Johnson, John
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Cavnar-Johnson, John
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Bill de hÓra
- RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Cavnar-Johnson, John
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Bill de hÓra
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=
- Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun,
Simon St.Laurent
COLAG Version 2.0,
Rahul Jain
Re: [xml-dev] Open Source or Else,
AndrewWatt2000
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [xml-dev] Open Source or Else,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] Open Source or Else,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Re: [xml-dev] Open Source or Else,
AndrewWatt2000
- RE: [xml-dev] Open Source or Else,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] Open Source or Else,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] Open Source or Else,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Open Source or Else,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
data input to an XSL produced page -- best practices,
Enoch Root
[xml-dev] XBRL loan applications [Was: Re:Are the publishing users happy? Why not?],
Ralph Hilken
SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Richard Tobin
- Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Gregory Murphy
- Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Richard Tobin
- RE: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Michael Kay
- Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Jeff Rafter
- Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Richard Tobin
- RE: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Michael Kay
- Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Richard Tobin
- Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Richard Tobin
- Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Richard Tobin
- Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Gregory Murphy
- Re: [xml-dev] SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Karl Waclawek
RE: [xml-dev] Fw: Report to Sender,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Fw: Report to Sender,
Bill Kearney
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Sean McGrath
Re: [xml-dev] XMLDOM Create object problem,
asim
XMLDOM Create object problem,
asim
Historical question about namespaces,
Gustaf Liljegren
"Non-Normative",
Gregory Murphy
RE: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Re: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother,
Bill Kearney
- RE: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother,
Joshua Allen
- RE: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother,
Joshua Allen
- RE: [xml-dev] Google as Big Brother,
Joshua Allen
Google as Big Brother,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Simon St.Laurent
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Ralph Hilken
- RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Doug Rudder
- RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Doug Rudder
- RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
AndrewWatt2000
- RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Michael Kay
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?,
J.Pietschmann
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?,
Berend de Boer
- RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?,
Michael Kay
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?,
Berend de Boer
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?,
K. Ari Krupnikov
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?,
K. Ari Krupnikov
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?,
Alaric B. Snell
- OT: client vs. server-side validation (was: Are the data users happy? Why not?),
K. Ari Krupnikov
- re: [xml-dev] OT: client vs. server-side validation (was: Are the data users happy? Why not?),
David Megginson
- Re: [xml-dev] OT: client vs. server-side validation (was: Are the data users happy? Why not?),
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?,
John Cowan
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?,
K. Ari Krupnikov
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?,
John Cowan
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?,
J.Pietschmann
- RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
XForms and XPath 1.0 conformance,
AndrewWatt2000
What is the value of XForms? (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
AndrewWatt2000
[ANN] eXchaNGeR (XML Browser + Editor) v1.0,
Edwin Dankert
Full-text search in XSLT 2.0/XPath 2.0/XQuery 1.0,
AndrewWatt2000
Safari and XSLT,
Mike Fitzgerald
RE: [xml-dev] BOXED XML (was RE: [xml-dev] Re: Remembering the original XML vision),
Don Box
OASIS TC Call For Participation: Education XML TC,
Karl Best
RXP test release for XML 1.1 and Namespaces 1.1,
Richard Tobin
RelaxNG problem about section 7.4. Restrictions on interleave,
Daniel Veillard
BOXED XML (was RE: [xml-dev] Re: Remembering the original XML vision),
Don Box
RE: [xml-dev] Anyone wanna speculate about what this means?,
Dare Obasanjo
Anyone wanna speculate about what this means?,
Mike Champion
RE: [xml-dev] Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Dare Obasanjo
RE: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision,
AndrewWatt2000
- Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision,
David Megginson
- Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision,
Tim Bray
- Unicode and XML (was Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision),
Mike Champion
- Re: [xml-dev] Unicode and XML (was Re: [xml-dev] Remembering theoriginal XML vision),
Tim Bray
- Re: [xml-dev] Unicode and XML (was Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision),
Daniel Veillard
- Re: [xml-dev] Unicode and XML (was Re: [xml-dev] Remembering theoriginal XML vision),
Tim Bray
- Re: [xml-dev] Unicode and XML (was Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision),
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: [xml-dev] Unicode and XML (was Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision),
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: [xml-dev] Unicode and XML (was Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the originalXML vision),
John Cowan
- Re: [xml-dev] Unicode and XML (was Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision),
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Message not available
- Re: [xml-dev] Unicode and XML (was Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision),
Tony Graham
- Re: [xml-dev] Unicode and XML (was Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision),
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: [xml-dev] Unicode and XML (was Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision),
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: [xml-dev] Unicode and XML (was Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision),
C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
- Message not available
- Re: [xml-dev] Unicode and XML (was Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision),
Tony Graham
- Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision,
David Megginson
- Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision,
Rick Jelliffe
- Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Jonathan Robie
- Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Jonathan Robie
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Jonathan Robie
- RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Owen Walcher
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Wendell Piez
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Norman Walsh
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
David Megginson
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
J.Pietschmann
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
David Megginson
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Norman Walsh
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Jonathan Robie
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Norman Walsh
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
J.Pietschmann
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Norman Walsh
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
David Megginson
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Norman Walsh
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
David Megginson
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Justin Lipton
- Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision,
David Megginson
- Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision,
Jonathan Robie
- Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision,
Thomas B. Passin
- Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision,
David Megginson
- Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision,
Jonathan Robie
RE: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Re: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision,
AndrewWatt2000
RE: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision,
Dare Obasanjo
RE: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision,
Dare Obasanjo
RE: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: [xml-dev] Remembering the original XML vision,
Dare Obasanjo
How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
AndrewWatt2000
- Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Jonathan Robie
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Jochen Wiedmann
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Jonathan Robie
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: [xml-dev] How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Water Contract),
Mike Plusch
- Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XMLvision),
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
- Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Jochen Wiedmann
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Chiusano Joseph
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Jochen Wiedmann
- Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XMLvision),
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Gustaf Liljegren
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering theoriginal XML vision),
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Jochen Wiedmann
- Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Henry S. Thompson
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Rick Jelliffe
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema Regex Pattern Question,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
XML Schema Regex Pattern Question,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
If prefix is exactly 'xml',
nmehrega
Re: [xml-dev] New XML tool for improving data-processing performance,
Shigeru Yoshida
Re: [xml-dev] Must databinding imply tight coupling? (was Re: Newtool for handling XML in Java),
Bill de hÓra
RE: [xml-dev] Must databinding imply tight coupling? (was Re: New tool for handlingXML in Java),
Jeff Lowery
Picking the Standard (WAS RE: [xml-dev] New tool for handling XML in Java),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: [xml-dev] Must databinding imply tight coupling? (was Re: New tool for handling XML in Java),
Dare Obasanjo
RE: [xml-dev] web services stack [data + context = information],
James Governor
OASIS TC Call for Participation: WSDM TC (Distributed Mgmt),
Karl Best
OASIS TC Call for Participation: WSRM TC (Reliable Messaging),
Karl Best
New XML tool for improving data-processing performance,
Shigeru Yoshida
finding new directions,
Simon St.Laurent
Xalan 2,4,1 URIResolver problems with JDK 1.4.1,
Andrzej Jan Taramina
RE: [xml-dev] New tool for handling XML in Java,
Dare Obasanjo
| | |
