[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
On Monday 24 February 2003 05:12 pm, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
> Future versions of XML that don't make the infoset a first class
> consideration are refusing to learn from history. For many people who
> use XML, the syntax is incidental but the data model is not.
In what problem domain? When someone sees
XML A -> processor XML A'
how can they tell that the transformation occured at an infoset level, or at
the syntax level?
There are arguably applications where *an* infoset/data model is necessary.
XML repositories spring to mind as being a good one
|
