[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill de hÓra [mailto:bill@dehora.net]
> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 4:44 PM
> To: Dare Obasanjo
> Cc: Jeff Lowery; Bullard, Claude L (Len); xml-dev@lists.xml.org
>
> And since XML 1.0 doesn't by definition have to conform to
> XML Namespaces, you can't produce a meaningful XML Infoset from some
> (most?) XML, but I'm being ungenerous now.
Yep, you're exagerrating. Do you sincerely believe that most XML documents use attributes named 'xmlns' or QNames in a manner inconsistent with the namespaces in XML recommendation? This is counter to my experiences with users of our XML APIs.
Although I'd admit that there are probably many users of XML who use Namespaces in XML without knowing how it works or the significance of 'xmlns' attributes.
--
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM
A bank is where they lend you an umbrella and then ask for it back when it begins to rain.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
|
