xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?

Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?
From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@yahoo.de>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 22:05:01 +0100
In-reply-to: <200302242255.RAA01279@mail.reutershealth.com>
References: <200302242255.RAA01279@mail.reutershealth.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130

John Cowan wrote:
> (and ISO 3166 countries include many that don't belong to
> the U.N., notably Switzerland, BTW)

If this statement is parsed to mean that Switzerland is
not an UN member, this is no longer correct. Update your
records :-)

J.Pietschmann

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?
  - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread