xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency?

Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:19:09 -0500
In-reply-to: <E18o1JK-0004N2-00@calvin.frontwire.com>
References: <OF047F14BF.0A3C2919-ONCA256CD8.00031C17@facs.gov.au><3E5C9518.1050402@expway.fr><15964.46767.897161.524921@megginson.com><E18o1JK-0004N2-00@calvin.frontwire.com>

Alaric B. Snell writes:

 > If your system is sitting idling waiting for data over the network, then a 
 > more compact representation would be a winner!

We'll look forward to your test results.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson, david@megginson.com, http://www.megginson.com/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
  - From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@alaric-snell.com>

References:
- Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
  - From: Matthew.Bennett@facs.gov.au
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
  - From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
  - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
  - From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@alaric-snell.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread