[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
But they all don't fit XML neatly depending on where
one stands among the range from syntax to system
implementation. A subset that redefines the XML
core rather than simply being an application subset
is disruptive and possibly unnecessarily so. TBD.
It's a cost issue. When to spend it and how much
to spend when. One can name the positions of
many of the people in this thread by determining
which of the three definitions for "XML interoperability"
that they believe their subset supports.
len
-----Original Message-----
From: Doug Ransom [mailto:Doug.Ransom@pwrm.com]
I prefer 1, but any fit.
|
