Lists Home |
Date Index |
Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> Question: how many of you participating in this
> thread have read Tim Bray's XML-SW paper at
> Perhaps we should, for a strawman's sake, put
> that one proposal on the table here on XML-Dev
> and debate its merits vis a vis our different
We could do that.
As for me, I'll stay out of the debate, since
I don't think there's anything worth discussing:
XML-SW is right on the mark.
> My objection to it was including namespaces
> in THE core. If it is not the core, nevermind;
> it is a good place to start on a subset.
My feeling is, as long as we're stuck with XML Namespaces
to begin with, XML-SW is as good a place as any to put them.