RE: [xml-dev] SGML->XML->? (was Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try)

["Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>]

I believe it would look like Tim Bray's XML-SW.

len

From: Dave Pawson [mailto:dpawson@nildram.co.uk]

At 11:22 06/02/2003 -0800, Jeff Lowery wrote:
> > So would the XML community be okay with defining a subset of XML?
>
>1.  Nobody agrees on what the subset is

I think it would make an interesting conversation if the original gang of 
?? (less than 10??)
sat down again today, and defined *sgml for the web*, with 20-20 hindsight.

I wonder how todays version would vary from XML as we know it?