Lists Home |
Date Index |
I believe it would look like Tim Bray's XML-SW.
From: Dave Pawson [mailto:email@example.com]
At 11:22 06/02/2003 -0800, Jeff Lowery wrote:
> > So would the XML community be okay with defining a subset of XML?
>1. Nobody agrees on what the subset is
I think it would make an interesting conversation if the original gang of
?? (less than 10??)
sat down again today, and defined *sgml for the web*, with 20-20 hindsight.
I wonder how todays version would vary from XML as we know it?