xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try

Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try
From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 10:14:25 -0500
In-reply-to: <200302101235.MAA23307@penguin.nag.co.uk>
Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
References: <GHEDLDCGLHKOAICLGHKGOEKDCAAA.news@owenwalcher.com> <200302100310.47625.gtn@rbii.com> <200302101235.MAA23307@penguin.nag.co.uk>
User-agent: KMail/1.4.3

On Monday 10 February 2003 07:35 am, David Carlisle wrote:
> Meanwhile a note on the W3C's home page points out that
> the original XML is five today....
>
> http://www.w3.org/2003/02/xml-at-5.html

It'd be nice if people mentioned the very active XML-SIG, and the W3C-SGML-WG 
before that. XML wasn't designed by a group of 12, but by a community.

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-sgml-wg/1996Aug/0001.html

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try
  - From: "Owen Walcher" <news@owenwalcher.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try
  - From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try
  - From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread