xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????

Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 20:19:22 -0500
In-reply-to: <15963.57936.208121.931029@megginson.com>
Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
References: <OF047F14BF.0A3C2919-ONCA256CD8.00031C17@facs.gov.au> <3E5BDD04.70105@yahoo.de> <15963.57936.208121.931029@megginson.com>
User-agent: KMail/1.4.3

On Tuesday 25 February 2003 04:38 pm, David Megginson wrote:
> We may just have to accept that the Tim B. twins (Tim
> Berners-Lee and Tim Bray) have been right all along, and that
> text-based formats really are efficient enough for the vast majority
> of applications.

This is also proposed by Kerningham and Pike in "The Practice of Programming" 
(a good book BTW).

References:
- Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
  - From: Matthew.Bennett@facs.gov.au
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
  - From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@yahoo.de>
- Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
  - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] collisions (was The subsetting has begun)
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] The subsetting has begun
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????)
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS