Lists Home |
Date Index |
email@example.com (Rich Salz) writes:
>So, you're pissed off that someone took your simplified markup tool
>and used it for other things?
Re-use is fine. Re-creation in a different image is obnoxious.
In this case, that "someone" has come back to modify the original well
from which they took water with "supplements" that may seem great to
them but are toxic to others.
I'm not exactly sure why people expect that I (and they) should just sit
around while the toxicity increases.
>And now you have to explain that (a)
>you don't want the rococo specs others are building;
> and (b) somehow
>the WS PR affects your ability to get work done?
Constantly. Both my day job and the work I do on my own.
>Gutenberg probably felt the same way.
Gutenberg was lucky - he was the first one on the ground. I don't know
what he'd think of today's media conglomerates, but he had other things
to worry about.
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org