[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
At 10:09 AM 2/4/2003 -0500, Rich Salz wrote:
>How much of the problem "XML needs to be compressed" is solved by just
>using GZIP transfer encoding over HTTP?
There are better ways to compress XML than GZip - for instance, XMill
claims to offer twice as much compression at approximately the same speed.
You can read about XMill here:
http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/liefke99xmill.html
You can download it here:
http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/xmill/
Here's a paper on compact representations of XML that can be used for querying:
http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/526771.html
Here's a paper on compact in-memory representation of XML data:
http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/neumiiller02compact.html
And for you document management folks, here's a paper on change-centric
management of versions:
http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/marian00changecentric.html
Warning: I have just browsed these papers, but they seem relevant and
interesting.
Jonathan
|