xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Resources Redeemed

Re: [xml-dev] Resources Redeemed

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Resources Redeemed
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 14:38:23 -0800
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EEEACEB8@hq1.pcmail.ingr.com>
References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EEEACEB8@hq1.pcmail.ingr.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130

Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:

> Thus, the biases, intentions, philosophies, behaviors, applicable contexts 
> such as background, social commitment, discussion, negotiation, 
> and exceptions are proper topics of study of resources.  One does 
> not study the resource by determining what it is but by what it 
> does.  

Hm... almost.  The Web Architecture doesn't say what a resource is, just 
how you name and talk to them.  RDF and humans can reasonably talk about 
what a resource is.  Good turn of phrase though.  -Tim

References:
- Resources Redeemed
  - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>

Prev by Date: XML parser bencmark to compare .NET parser and Java parser?
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] XML parser bencmark to compare .NET parser and Javaparser?
Previous by thread: Resources Redeemed
Next by thread: XML parser bencmark to compare .NET parser and Java parser?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread