[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
alaric@alaric-snell.com (Alaric B. Snell) writes:
>....but I suspect, in practice, that it would be hard for a processor
>to (when processing D) note that it had two parents unless it did all
>its own entity expansion and kept track of that explicitly.
So you have a different notion of sharing subtrees, I guess, since I
don't worry about children with multiple parents. I just meant that
it's pretty easy to ship XML fragments around.
Given my general lack of patience for or interest in directed graphs of
any variety, I'll return to markup and leave discussions of graphs
alone.
--
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org
|
