[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003 16:33:38 -0500, Elliotte Rusty Harold
<elharo@metalab.unc.edu> wrote:
> It might be some improvement (is it better to reject some well-formed
> documents or accept some malformed ones?) but not enough. I'm not
> willing to settle for less than full conformance to the minimum level of
> XML 1.0.
I for one would find it very interesting if they were to implement the XML-
SW profile, as long as they call it a subset of XML 1.0 of course, and
don't imply that it will ever have standing as a W3C Recommendation. BTW,
if the J2ME folks who may be listening don't catch the reference to "XML-
SW" we're talking about http://www.textuality.com/xml/xmlSW.html.
I suspect Tim will be happiest if people pay very careful attention to the
"Status of this document" section :-)
|
