RE: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try

["Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>]

It seems you missed the threads about Water and ConciseXML. They are linked below for your viewing pleasure 
 
 http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200301/msg00322.html
 
http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200301/msg00366.html
 
 http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200301/msg00418.html
 
I can't think of any comment to make about your SML (isn't this name taken?) that wasn't made in the above threads less than a month ago. 

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Don Park [mailto:donpark@docuverse.com] 
	Sent: Tue 2/4/2003 7:36 PM 
	To: Xml-Dev 
	Cc: 
	Subject: [xml-dev] SML: Second Try
	
	

	All,
	
	In the last attempt to simplify XML, two key requirements were a)
	compatibility with XML, and b) minimalization.  This time, I removed the
	compatibility requirement and shifted to focus to user-friendly syntax:
	easier to read and write than XML.  First rought cut of the syntax is
	described informally as a blog post.
	
	http://www.docuverse.com/blog/donpark/2003/02/04.html#a200
	
	Please keep in mind that the syntax is incomplete but presented here to
	promote discussion and exploration.
	
	Best,
	
	Don Park
	Docuverse
	
	
	
	-----------------------------------------------------------------
	The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
	initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
	
	The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
	
	To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
	manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>