xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] collisions (was The subsetting has begun)

Re: [xml-dev] collisions (was The subsetting has begun)

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] collisions (was The subsetting has begun)
From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 19:29:16 -0500
Cc: Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com>, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F804B54D50@RED-MSG-10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>; from dareo@microsoft.com on Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 04:20:35PM -0800
References: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F804B54D50@RED-MSG-10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Reply-to: veillard@redhat.com
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i

On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 04:20:35PM -0800, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
> Exactly what is wrong with the "Project Record in XML" from a document
> design perspective? 

  yep, I'm wondering too :-)

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard@redhat.com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] collisions (was The subsetting has begun)
  - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] collisions (was The subsetting has begun)
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] collisions (was The subsetting has begun)
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] collisions (was The subsetting has begun)
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] collisions (was The subsetting has begun)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread