xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch

Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch
From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 10:16:03 -0500
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <E18nIwx-0000PX-00@mercury.ccil.org>; from cowan@mercury.ccil.org on Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 08:47:19AM -0500
References: <oprk18a51jezizxn@smtp.comcast.net> <E18nIwx-0000PX-00@mercury.ccil.org>
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i

On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 08:47:19AM -0500, John Cowan wrote:
> The Sun specification makes it impossible to use a conformant XML parser as
> a J2ME implementation.

Which is ironic considering that my team built a conformant J2ME/CLDC
non-validating SAX based XML parser for Sun back in '99.

MB
-- 
Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.        http://www.markbaker.ca
Web architecture consulting, technical reports, evaluation & analysis

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch
  - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
- Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch
  - From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>

Prev by Date: No Standard Before Its Time (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Parsing Performance)
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Could someone give a precise definition to these terms and the relationships between them?
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread