[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
mc@xegesis.org (Mike Champion) writes:
>I'm sure there's a few thousand people out there who would be happy
>users of pure syntax XML tools such as SAX,
Hmm... SAX may be close to the document, but it's certainly not a "pure
XML syntax tool" unless perhaps the Infoset is as well.
See, for example, Appendix B of David Brownell's _SAX2_, which is a
direct comparison of the SAX2 API to the various items in the Infoset.
Not a perfect match, but the flavors are clearly similar.
(I'm working on an API that's basically strings + context. I'm not even
sure that will qualify as a pure XML syntax tool, but we'll see.
Time... need time!)
--
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org
|
