[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 11:35:29AM -0500, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> rsalz@datapower.com (Rich Salz) writes:
> >Oh this is so wrong. Cf RFC 3117.
>
> RFC 3117 ("On the Design of Application Protocols") is excellent reading
> whatever your protocol interests or arguments may be. It's really nice
> to have an informational RFC explaining the why that accompanies the
> more formal RFCs (3080, 3081) explaining how.
>
> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3117.txt
There's some good stuff in there, but also a lot of incorrect stuff
as well, especially the conclusion.
We need less protocols, not more, because we need more interoperability,
not less.
MB
--
Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca
Web architecture consulting, technical reports, evaluation & analysis
|
