[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
On Wednesday 19 February 2003 10:58 am, Tony Graham wrote:
> > > There are a fair number of characters that really don't make much
> > > sense as markup... and XML 1.0 is pretty conservative, but generally
> > > sensible. At the time, there were no good guidelines from the Unicode
> > > consortium on what should/should not be allowed, which is something
> > > they have addressed recently.
> >
> > The Unicode Standard, Version 2.0, was published in 1996. Section
> > 5.14, Identifiers, contains guidelines for "the definition of
> > identifier syntax."
That was considered as part of the work on XML 1.0, but wasn't sufficient by
itself.
|
