[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
From: "Mike Plusch" <mplusch@clearmethods.com>
> Correct, the Schematron example is more complex. For example, you
> didn't include the definition for 'tr' or the definition for 'table'.
>
> The closest comparable for your snipet:
> <rule context="tr"><assert test="count(td) <="../table/@cols"/></rule>
??? In Schematron we are not defining elements but patterns.
We don't need any definition for table.
Cheers
Rick Jelliffe
|