xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?

Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 00:02:23 -0500
In-reply-to: <5.2.0.9.0.20030218172713.02ef7fb0@ncmail.datadirect-technologies.com>
Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
References: <5.2.0.9.0.20030218172713.02ef7fb0@ncmail.datadirect-technologies.com>
User-agent: KMail/1.4.3

On Tuesday 18 February 2003 05:30 pm, Jonathan Robie wrote:
> For publishing, is there a market ready to accept some set of tools that
> vendors could create for them? 

A very good question. I think there are plenty of tools that *publishers* 
will/could and do use. 

As for producers of information, and general EIM, that is an entirely 
different matter.

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
  - From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@datadirect-technologies.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Water Contract)
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread