[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
On Sat, 22 Feb 2003 13:32:00 -0500 (EST), John Cowan
<cowan@mercury.ccil.org> wrote:
>> The people behind sml-dev got this right, technically and economically -
>> they specified the subset for everyone's use. Perhaps similar work could
>> be chartered by the W3C,
>
> It has been.
Uhh, are you talking about "There may, however, be a need for having a
finer classification that would distinguish the various non-validating
processors: for example, those that expand external parsed entities from
those that don't." in http://www.w3.org/2001/12/xmlbp/xml-core-wg-
charter.html#deliverables? That's giving the Core WG permission to look
into subsetting / conformance profiling if they want to, not chartering
them to go forth and do so, as I understand it. Were you thinking of
something else?
|
