[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
I had the same question...I checked all the specs and there is not.
This appears to be a random stream-of-consciouness on the part of the
poster (todd glassey).
"Henry S. Thompson" wrote:
>
> "todd glassey" <todd.glassey@worldnet.att.net> writes:
>
> > That makes the W3C's referring to anything that this group does as part of
> > its standard a copyright violation unless that precursor work has reached
> > the state of OASIS Standard.
>
> Ah -- I've been trying to figure out what this sub-thread has to do
> with the announcement of XPointer going to REC, and _maybe_ I've just
> found the connection - is there a reference to an OASIS draft or
> something in one of the XPointer specs that you think shouldn't be
> there?
>
> ht
> --
> Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
> Half-time member of W3C Team
> 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
> Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
> URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
> [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
begin:vcard
n:Chiusano;Joseph
tel;work:(703) 902-6923
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:www.bah.com
org:Booz | Allen | Hamilton;IT Digital Strategies Team
adr:;;8283 Greensboro Drive;McLean;VA;22012;
version:2.1
email;internet:chiusano_joseph@bah.com
title:Senior Consultant
fn:Joseph M. Chiusano
end:vcard
|
