xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] OASIS/W3C (was XPointer REC)

Re: [xml-dev] OASIS/W3C (was XPointer REC)

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: todd glassey <todd.glassey@worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] OASIS/W3C (was XPointer REC)
From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 11:29:53 -0800
Cc: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <000b01c2f3ad$53c5a9f0$020aff0a@tsg1>
References: <r01050400-1024-60D906985F9C11D7B8F80003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]> <000b01c2f3ad$53c5a9f0$020aff0a@tsg1>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021212

Todd, it seems that you are teaasing us rather than trying to 
communicate with us. If you believe that the W3C hsa referrered 
inappropriately from one of its specs to an OASIS specification, please 
give us the URL for both documents so that we can judge for ourselves!

And if this has anything whatsoever to do with XPointer, please make 
that connection clear.

  Paul Prescod

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] OASIS/W3C (was XPointer REC)
  - From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>

References:
- OASIS/W3C (was XPointer REC)
  - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] OASIS/W3C (was XPointer REC)
  - From: "todd glassey" <todd.glassey@worldnet.att.net>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] OASIS/W3C (was XPointer REC)
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] OASIS/W3C (was XPointer REC)
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] OASIS/W3C (was XPointer REC)
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] OASIS/W3C (was XPointer REC)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread